State of Michigan

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Lansing

JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM

governor

REBECCA  A. HUMPHRIES

director

 


 

 

BILL ANALYSIS

 

BILL NUMBER:

HOUSE BILL 4561 (AS INTRODUCED)

TOPIC:

Earmark percentage of revenue for an endowment account from sale of certain forest land by school districts

 

SPONSOR:

Representative Goeff Hansen

CO-SPONSORS:

None

COMMITTEE:

Education

Analysis Done:

March 25, 2009

POSITION

The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) opposes this legislation. 

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

The original PA 217 of 1931 was enacted to provide for the establishment of municipal (county, township, city, village, or school district) forests, including the acquisition of state lands by municipalities to be managed for forestry purposes.  It provided specific guidance as to how such lands were to be managed on a long-term basis and provided for the reversion of the lands back to the state when the lands were no longer used for forestry purposes.  Approximately 75,000 acres of state land were deeded to municipalities throughout the state under this act.  Most of these lands were deeded prior to 1960 and were actively managed as forests for many years by the municipalities.  PA 217 was incorporated into PA 451 of 1994 with little change from the original act, and the language remained the same until 2004.

In 2004, the DNR opposed the original introduced version of HB 5313 which would have removed reverter language from all property deeded to municipalities and schools for forestry purposes.  The bill was amended to address some of the DNR's concerns, but still provided for the removal of the reverter language from deeded properties which were not "prime lands" as defined in the subsequently approved legislation, PA 377 of 2004.  To clarify the intent and correct language in the 2004 act, it was subsequently amended by PA 179 of 2006.  In addition to making corrections to the 2004 act language, PA 179 also weakened the definition of “prime lands” and allowed the state’s reverter interest to be removed from municipal forest lands that are “not prime.”  The DNR was neutral on PA 179 because the Departments of Management and Budget and Treasury were anticipating some short-term revenues for the General Fund from the proceeds of land sales.  The amount going to state funds is 50 percent of the proceeds when the released forest land is sold by the municipality under the current law.

This newly introduced 2009 legislation will further weaken and dilute the protections afforded to municipal forests under the prime lands criteria by providing a further financial incentive to school districts to dispose of their school forest lands.  The 50 - 50 split of sale proceeds between the school district and the state will become a 90 - 10 split in favor of the school district. 

DESCRIPTION OF BILL

The bill will amend the Municipal Forest part of 1994 PA 451, Section 52706 (4) (MCL 324.52706) which currently reads in part:  “If the conveyance is to a public agency or any other person for fair market value, the public agency conveying the property shall have an accounting taken, shall retain 50 percent of the proceeds, and shall submit the remaining 50 percent of the proceeds to the department of treasury for deposit as follows…"  The amendment will change the 50 percent of the proceeds to 90 percent to be retained for a school district and provide that the school district put the money into an endowment fund.             

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

Pro

None

Con

The bill will provide for even more municipal forest lands to be converted to other non-forest uses than the 2006 amendment provided for, because of the additional financial incentive to school districts.  The intent of the original Community Forest Act, PA 217 of 1931, will be further diluted. The General Fund will be deprived of revenue.

FISCAL/ECONOMIC IMPACT

Are there revenue or budgetary implications in the bill to the --

(a)     Department

Budgetary:

Additional applications to remove reverters will result in the expenditure of staff time which is unfunded.

Revenue:   

None

Comments:

There are no funds provided to the Department to administer this program.

(b)     State

Budgetary:

This legislation will result in a reduction in revenue to the General Fund.

Revenue:   

HB 4561 will bring about an 80 percent reduction in revenue for school district properties sold.

Comments:

This bill will generate additional unfunded cost to the state to review with an associated large reduction in revenue.

(c)     Local Government

Comments:

HB 4561 will increase revenues to a few school districts if they sell municipal forest property.  However, school districts and other municipalities that choose to sell their municipal forest land will forgo the opportunity for long-term revenues from sustainable forest management activities.  These might equal or exceed the interest they might earn from a long-term fund which they will be obligated to establish under the proposed bill.

OTHER STATE DEPARTMENTS

The Departments of Treasury and Management and Budget should have concerns because of some negative revenue implications.

ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

None

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES IMPACT

Rules are not necessary to administer this part of the NREPA.

 

 

 

_______________________________

Rebecca A. Humphries

Director

 

_______________________________

Date

 

FMFM